Mayberry Berk · Console
Auth disabled — running in dev-only no-auth mode. Configure Clerk keys to enable.
← back to documents

Pre-litigation demand — Roe v. Quickloan Solutions

demand_letter · v1 · status ai generated · matter ROSENTHAL
# DEMAND FOR SETTLEMENT — ROSENTHAL FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT

Re: Roe v. Quickloan Solutions, LLC
Account #: [REDACTED]

Dear Counsel:

This firm represents Mr. John Roe in connection with violations of the California Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1788 *et seq.*, by your client.

Between March 1 and April 12, 2026, your client placed no fewer than sixty-two (62) calls to Mr. Roe at his place of employment, despite repeated written notice to cease such contact, in violation of Cal. Civ. Code § 1788.11(d) and *Riggs v. Prober & Raphael*, 681 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir. 2012).

Pursuant to Cal. Civ. Code § 1788.30, Mr. Roe is entitled to:
- Actual damages
- Statutory damages of up to $1,000 per violation
- Reasonable attorneys' fees and costs

We demand $35,000 to resolve this matter without litigation. This offer expires in 21 days.

Sincerely,
[Founder name TODO]